January 27, 2016
Written by Elizabeth Salazar, Program Officer, Institute for Reproductive Health, Georgetown University
Family planning programs are often directed toward women. They usually give little attention to the way that traditional gender norms—societal and cultural expectations of what it means to be a man or a woman—impact modern method use. But gender norms affect couples’ ability to discuss and make informed decisions about family planning and can influence access to information and services. Also, gender-related power dynamics often mean that men have greater say in whether and when sex occurs and if a family planning method is used.
As a result of our better understanding of the influence of gender on family planning, there is a growing recognition that programs aimed at both men and women are more effective than those aimed solely at women and that positive male engagement interventions can improve partner communication and bring about more gender-equitable attitudes.
Getting the lay of the land
IRH launched an initiative to learn about the essential elements needed for implementing gender transformative male engagement in family planning programs. This initiative began with a program review of recent interventions that have deliberately involved men in sexual and reproductive health. The analysis revealed that despite the rich and varied experiences of involving men in sexual and reproductive health, evidence is lacking on what qualifies as promising practices for engaging men.
Let’s talk about it
To renew interest and discuss the evidence around male involvement, IRH convened a technical consultation of researchers and practitioners. Participants shared their experiences and discussed results of the approaches used in their programs. A major theme of the discussion was gender-transformative programming. The World Health Organization defines gender-transformative programming as: “Programs which aim to transform gender roles and promote more gender-equitable relationships between men and women. They seek to critically reflect about, question or change institutional practices and broader social norms that create and reinforce gender inequality and vulnerability for men and women.”
A deep dive
IRH then dove deep into gender-transformative programming by conducting a cross-case analysis of four family planning initiatives across eight countries. This analysis discussed implementation experiences and results and identified essential intervention elements to be considered when defining emerging best practices for engaging men in family planning. A consistent theme was that successful programs addressed underlying gender norms and existing power imbalances between men and women.
Where are we now
Increasingly, the sexual and reproductive health community is recognizing that programs must address underlying social (including gender) norms in order to achieve widespread, lasting change.
For programs desiring a gender transformative approach to family planning, keep these essential elements in mind:
Provide a ‘comfort zone’ for men to discuss family planning and sexual and reproductive healthFoster a sense of shared responsibility for family planningPromote couple communicationCreate opportunities to redefine inequitable gender norms related to family planningOffer family planning services in the communityProvide models of positive male behavior and positive consequences of engagementCreate male-targeted, positive messagingFocus on both men and women
If you want more information about designing gender-transformative programs and examples of male engagement interventions:
Visit IRH’s exhibit (#71) at ICFP to check out other resources related to our work in gender and involving men in family planning interventions.